File:110630.pdf

Description

A paper discussing the U.S. Navy's efforts to protect workers from asbestos exposure

Abstract

Reviews the U.S. Navy's efforts to protect workers from **asbestos exposure** at the Long Beach and Norfolk Naval Shipyards. It also provides information on the **use of asbestos in Navy ships**, the **cost of removal**, and **compensation programs** for asbestos-related disabilities. Although newly constructed ships contain little to no asbestos thermal insulation, many existing Navy ships have **large quantities of asbestos**. The Navy does not plan a single, comprehensive fleet-wide asbestos removal program, estimating the cost at **$2 billion**, and instead focuses on **selective removal and replacement** of damaged or high-maintenance insulation. Comprehensive asbestos control programs were established at the shipyards, but the report found that **implementation needed improvement** due to insufficient staffing, worker non-compliance with safety procedures, and inadequate monitoring and enforcement. Specific deficiencies were noted at both Long Beach and Norfolk. The report recommends ensuring that programs are **effectively monitored and enforced** and that **sufficient resources** are provided for implementation. The Navy Department concurred with these recommendations and reported ongoing efforts to improve programs. The report also briefly discusses the availability of **disability compensation programs** for affected individuals.

Summary

This General Accounting Office report from 1979 examines the Navy's efforts to safeguard workers from asbestos exposure, particularly at the Long Beach and Norfolk Naval Shipyards. While acknowledging the Navy's transition away from asbestos in newer ships and its established asbestos control programs, the report highlights persistent issues with proper implementation and enforcement due to insufficient staffing and worker reluctance to follow protocols. Despite a significant estimated cost, the Navy opts against a comprehensive asbestos removal program, focusing instead on selective removal during repairs and emphasizing strict work standards and alternative materials, even as it recognizes potential health risks from such substitutes as fibrous glass. The report also briefly outlines disability compensation programs available for affected civilian and military personnel.