Customer Service Training: Building Confidence And Communication Skills
End Hiring Agreeable People for Customer Service: How Personality Trumps Niceness Every Time
I'm about to share something that will likely offend every recruitment person who sees this: recruiting people for customer service due to how "pleasant" they come across in an meeting is part of the biggest errors you can do.
Agreeable gets you nothing when a customer is yelling at you about a issue that is not your responsibility, demanding solutions that don't exist, and threatening to damage your company on online platforms.
What succeeds in those moments is resilience, professional boundary-setting, and the skill to stay concentrated on solutions rather than drama.
I figured out this truth the difficult way while working with a major shopping chain in Melbourne. Their recruitment process was completely centered on finding "customer-oriented" applicants who were "inherently friendly" and "enjoyed helping people."
Sounds logical, right?
The outcome: extremely high turnover, constant absence, and service quality that was constantly subpar.
After I examined what was occurring, I learned that their "nice" staff were being totally destroyed by difficult clients.
These staff had been hired for their inherent caring nature and need to please others, but they had zero training or inherent barriers against internalizing every person's difficult energy.
Worse, their genuine inclination to please people meant they were continuously committing to requests they couldn't meet, which caused even additional frustrated people and more pressure for themselves.
I saw truly compassionate individuals leave in days because they were unable to handle the mental strain of the job.
At the same time, the rare staff who performed well in challenging client relations environments had entirely different traits.
Such individuals did not seem necessarily "nice" in the conventional sense. Rather, they were strong, self-assured, and fine with setting boundaries. They really desired to serve people, but they furthermore had the strength to state "no" when required.
Such staff managed to recognize a person's anger without taking it as their fault. They managed to stay professional when clients got unreasonable. They could focus on finding practical fixes rather than getting trapped in interpersonal arguments.
Those traits had minimal to do with being "agreeable" and much to do with emotional intelligence, personal confidence, and resilience.
The team completely changed their selection procedure. Instead of screening for "nice" people, we commenced testing for emotional strength, analytical skills, and ease with boundary-setting.
In assessments, we offered people with actual client relations examples: frustrated clients, unreasonable demands, and situations where there was absolutely no complete resolution.
In place of inquiring how they would keep the person pleased, we questioned how they would handle the scenario effectively while maintaining their own emotional stability and maintaining organizational guidelines.
Our applicants who did excellently in these situations were rarely the ones who had at first appeared most "agreeable."
Alternatively, they were the ones who showed systematic thinking under challenging conditions, ease with communicating "that's not possible" when appropriate, and the ability to differentiate their individual feelings from the person's mental state.
Six months after introducing this new selection strategy, employee satisfaction dropped by nearly 60%. Service quality improved remarkably, but more significantly, ratings specifically for demanding client encounters got better remarkably.
Let me explain why this strategy is effective: customer service is essentially about solution-finding under pressure, not about being constantly appreciated.
Customers who contact customer service are typically previously annoyed. They have a problem they cannot fix themselves, they've often previously worked through multiple approaches, and they want competent help, not superficial niceness.
That which angry clients really want is a representative who:
Recognizes their issue promptly and correctly
Shows real competence in grasping and handling their situation
Offers straightforward information about what can and cannot be achieved
Assumes appropriate action quickly and continues through on agreements
Preserves composed demeanor even when the customer gets upset
Notice that "agreeableness" doesn't appear anywhere on that set of requirements.
Skill, appropriate behavior, and reliability matter significantly more than agreeableness.
In fact, too much agreeableness can often be counterproductive in customer service encounters. When customers are really angry about a significant issue, inappropriately upbeat or enthusiastic behavior can seem as dismissive, insincere, or insensitive.
I consulted with a banking company company where support people had been taught to always maintain "upbeat attitude" regardless of the person's circumstances.
Such an method worked fairly well for standard questions, but it was entirely unsuitable for significant issues.
When clients reached out because they'd been denied large sums of money due to system errors, or because they were facing economic difficulty and desperately wanted to arrange assistance solutions, artificially upbeat reactions seemed as callous and wrong.
I retrained their staff to match their interpersonal style to the gravity of the customer's circumstances. Serious problems required serious, professional reactions, not artificial upbeat energy.
Customer satisfaction got better right away, notably for complex situations. Clients felt that their issues were being taken with proper attention and that the staff assisting them were competent professionals rather than merely "nice" individuals.
It takes me to a different crucial point: the gap between empathy and interpersonal involvement.
Skilled client relations staff must have empathy - the skill to acknowledge and respond to someone else's person's emotions and situations.
But they absolutely do not need to take on those emotions as their own.
Interpersonal taking on is what occurs when customer service people start experiencing the same upset, worry, or hopelessness that their people are feeling.
This interpersonal internalization is incredibly draining and contributes to burnout, poor performance, and high employee departures.
Professional compassion, on the other hand, permits staff to acknowledge and attend to clients' emotional needs without accepting ownership for solving the customer's mental state.
Such difference is vital for maintaining both work effectiveness and individual stability.
Given this, what should you screen for when selecting support people?
To start, emotional awareness and resilience. Screen for candidates who can keep composed under pressure, who do not accept client anger as their fault, and who can separate their own emotions from someone else's people's mental situations.
Second, problem-solving ability. Support is essentially about understanding challenges and creating workable solutions. Look for candidates who tackle challenges logically and who can analyze effectively even when interacting with emotional people.
Furthermore, comfort with standard-maintaining. Look for individuals who can state "no" appropriately but definitively when appropriate, and who recognize the difference between staying helpful and being manipulated.
Additionally, real engagement in helping people rather than just "pleasing people." The best support staff are motivated by the intellectual satisfaction of solving complex issues, not just by a need to be liked.
Most importantly, career self-assurance and inner strength. Support people who appreciate themselves and their work knowledge are significantly better at maintaining professional relationships with clients and delivering consistently high-quality service.
Don't forget: you're not recruiting individuals to be customer service friends or psychological comfort counselors. You're hiring professional professionals who can offer high-quality service while protecting their own mental health and upholding professional expectations.
Select for competence, strength, and professionalism. Agreeableness is secondary. Service excellence is crucial.
Should you loved this short article and you wish to receive more details relating to Custom Training Sydney assure visit our own web-page.